While repology tries its best in matching packages across different repositories, this is quite a complex task:
- Packages of a single software project may be named differently in some repositories (for instance, libagg vs. agg, dungeoncrawl vs. dungeon-crawl, fonts-linuxlibertine vs. fonts-ttf-linuxlibertine vs. linux-libertine-fonts vs. linuxlibertine-fonts-ttf).
- There may be multiple unrelated software projects with a same name (for instance, clementine is both X11 window manager and a media player).
- Some packages may use incorrect versions (for instance, picking "next" version number which was not released yet when packaging a git snapshot, or using dates and commit hashes instead of version numbers).
Repology uses a set of manually edited rules to resolve these cases. You may submit a change to the ruleset directly or use this form to suggest an improvement to the ruleset. Please only use this for for problems which may be fixed by the ruleset (which are basically problems listed above).
Current reports (3)
Created more than a year ago,
rejected
- The project needs some version(s) to be marked as ignored
- Comment:
another date based version that should be ignored:
Gentoo dev-qt/qt-docs 5.15.2_p202011130614
- Repology reply:
There's no need to ignore non-latest versions
Created more than a year ago,
accepted
- The project needs some version(s) to be marked as ignored
- Comment:
please ignore date-based versions such as:
openSUSE Tumbleweed qt6-macros 20201210
Created more than a year ago,
accepted
- The project needs other projects merged into it
- Comment:
Arch has a couple of qt6 package that are group here, but there are dozens of qt6 packages. It seems all the qt6-* and mingw:qt6* should be included here (and qt5 considered a legacy branch).
New report