While repology tries its best in matching packages across different repositories, this is quite a complex task:
- Packages of a single software project may be named differently in some repositories (for instance, libagg vs. agg, dungeoncrawl vs. dungeon-crawl, fonts-linuxlibertine vs. fonts-ttf-linuxlibertine vs. linux-libertine-fonts vs. linuxlibertine-fonts-ttf).
- There may be multiple unrelated software projects with a same name (for instance, clementine is both X11 window manager and a media player).
- Some packages may use incorrect versions (for instance, picking "next" version number which was not released yet when packaging a git snapshot, or using dates and commit hashes instead of version numbers).
Repology uses a set of manually edited rules to resolve these cases. You may submit a change to the ruleset directly or use this form to suggest an improvement to the ruleset. Please only use this for problems which may be fixed by the ruleset (which are basically problems listed above).
Current reports (2)
Created 4 years ago,
rejected
- Comment:
The home page for this package has moved to https://beyondgrep.com/
Created 5 years ago,
accepted
- The project needs some version(s) to be marked as ignored
- Comment:
Hey! Thanks for invitation, that's pleasant to see you appreciate my small contribution.
I want rather to continue reporting here, however, for some reasons.
First, you often create more complete rules, than just what is reported, as you know system better.
Secondly, I very like possibility to collaborate anonymously, and want to use it.
On double work, I can make split reports a bit concise, if you want to.
I hope you are ok with that.
Keep up your good work!
Ad rem: version greater than 2.22 aren't upstream.
- Repology reply:
No, the reports are great. It just takes time to process them and I hoped to save it by adding a collaborator (less complete rules and possible mistakes are not a problem at all as we all learn and it's totally worth extending a project's community, development throughput and increading a bus factor), but it's ok if you prefer to just submit reports. Thank you again! NB: 2.23_02 is actually upstream, but it looks like a devel version.
New report